For information about COVID-19, including symptoms and prevention, please read our COVID-19 patient guide. Please also consider supporting Weill Cornell Medicine’s efforts against the pandemic.

Research Integrity Officer (RIO)

Introduction

The RIO oversees research integrity, compliance, misconduct, conflict management, and all elements of conducting research in an ethical and appropriate manner as per federal, state and institutional regulations.

The Research Integrity Officer (RIO) at Weill Cornell Medicine is Thomas Blair (646.962.2100 or thb200@med.cornell.edu).

WCM Research Integrity Policy

Research integrity is defined as:

  • The use of honest and verifiable methods in proposing, performing, and evaluating research;
  • Reporting research results with particular attention to adherence to rules, regulations, and guidelines; and,
  • Following commonly accepted professional codes or norms.

The WCM Research Misconduct Policy can be found below.

Research Misconduct

Research misconduct is defined as:

  • The fabrication of data (making up data or results and recording or reporting them), 
  • The falsification of data (manipulation of research materials, equipment or processes or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record),
  • Plagiarism (appropriation of another person’s ideas, processes, results or words without giving appropriate credit), and/or 
  • Deviations from accepted scientific practice.

Deviations from accepted scientific practice may include the abuse of confidentiality, violation of pertinent federal or institutional regulations and ethical codes, and aiding or facilitating acts of academic dishonesty by others.

Research misconduct may also occur if an investigator is aware or recklessly disregards that members of his/her lab or in another lab are engaging in prohibited activities and does not take action to report such activities. To that end, Laboratory directors and scientific leaders must accept special responsibility for the appropriate supervision and teaching of other staff and students, and ultimately must assume responsibility for the validity of all research communications emanating from their laboratories.  Carefully recorded experimental protocols and methods are strong deterrents to research misconduct.  It is the responsibility of the researcher to ensure that records are maintained to adequately document the work performed.

Honest error or honest differences in interpretation or judgment of data are not regarded as research misconduct

Reporting Misconduct

To have an anonymous confidential conversation regrading questions concerning research misconduct you can contact the RIO or you may contact Cornell University’s Ethics point hotline or website:

EthicsPoint hotline: (866) 293-3077
EthicsPoint website: www.hotline.cornell.edu

Responsible Conduct of Research Course

The purpose of this course is to heighten the awareness of trainees to ethical considerations relevant to the conduct of research; Inform trainees of federal, state, and institutional policies, regulations and procedures applicable to the ethical conduct of research; and provide trainees with the opportunity to discuss, in a relatively informal setting, with senior faculty and among their peers, the implications of these policies and procedures for their own behavior in a research environment.

Policies and Forms

Policies

  • This policy shall apply to all faculty, non-faculty academic staff, non-academic staff, medical and graduate students and graduate trainees who are engaged in the conduct of research, regardless of the source of funding, if any.

FAQs

No FAQs available.

Announcements

No Announcements at this time.

Office Contacts

Thomas H. Blair, J.D.
Research Integrity Officer
Phone:
(646) 962-2100