Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation - Moore Inventor Fellowship

In Spring 2025, the Moore Foundation selected their tenth and final cohort, completing the mission to support “50 fellows to shape the next 50 years.” With this milestone, the Moore Inventor Fellows has fulfilled its commitment, and the foundation is no longer inviting nominations.

Budget:
  • $200,000 per year for 3 years plus an additional $25,000 per year for grant administration costs.
  • Funds may be used for fellow's salary, to hire support, and to purchase services, equipment, and supplies.
  • The Foundation seeks strong institutional support, including 25% protected time for the inventor to dedicate to the invention, and a commitment of $50K per year in direct costs.

Number of Applications: 2 applications from Cornell (including Ithaca)

Program Description:

Gordon Moore’s contribution to the development of microelectronics helped produce the exponential growth of the digital revolution that continues today. In the spirit of Moore’s passion for science and penchant for inventing, the foundation is supporting early-career scientist-inventors who create new tools and technologies with a high potential to accelerate progress in the foundation’s areas of interest: scientific research, environmental conservation and patient care.

The foundation plans to allocate nearly $34 million through 2026 to support 50 Moore Inventor Fellows and work with them on the commercialization of their inventions. The Moore Foundation has knowledge on FDA approval and commercialization of inventions and want to guide the Moore Inventors through the process.

The competition focuses on early-career staff at major research universities, additional institutions from among the top 50 National Institutes of Health-funded medical schools and universities, and selected non-academic environmental research and patient care institutions.

Typically, five awards are made each year selected from roughly 200 invited institutions that put forth two nominees each.

The Moore Foundation hosted a webinar on October 12. Please find a recodring and important information about the program at the links below:

Q&A Session Recording Link

2025 MIF FAQ

2025 MIF Application Guidelines

Moore Foundation Grantee Resource Webpage 

Additional Details:

  • The Moore Inventor Fellows program focuses on supporting scientist-inventors at a critical stage of research to capture opportunities that otherwise might be missed.
  • The Foundation seeks to provide freedom and support to the most promising inventors with the most compelling ideas to pursue creative work.
  • The Foundation aims to support inventions at an early stage that could lead to proof-of-concept work on an invention or advance an existing prototype that tackles an important problem. The Foundation seeks innovations with the promise of making a long-lasting impact by addressing underlying problems in their field, but a clear path toward commercialization is not a requirement.
  • In terms of the “readiness” of the project, the Moore Foundation is interested in projects that are not yet ready for commercialization, outside the scope of venture capitals, but where all the research to establish the invention has been performed. The Moore Foundation is interested in the “in between” projects and wants to help propel the innovation out of the lab and into the next stage of development.
  • About the Invention: The program has a translational focus and is looking for a technique or an instrumental advance that would be used by other people (new hardware, or novel application of existing hardware).
  • The scope of this call is intentionally wide: proposed projects do not need to fall within our current funding priorities, but should be broadly within the program areas of foundation interest (science, environmental conservation and patient care). The exception is for nominees proposing ideas and inventions that target patient care. Within this realm, we seek overlap with our current emphasis on improving the experience and outcomes of patients, including solutions that improve clinical diagnosis, medication safety in the community and community-based serious illness care. In particular, they are interested in novel clinical diagnostic methods.
  • Please note that the proposed research should not include clinical trials and awarded funds should not be used to cover clinical trials.
  • The Foundation recognizes that real invention can take surprising turns, so they seek creative individuals who have big ideas, deep knowledge, and the courage to take smart risks. The Foundation recognizes that inventors and innovators come from a diversity of backgrounds, disciplines, and experiences and will look for creativity across a broad array of academic programs and research departments. Examples of such programs include, but are not limited to: environmental science and conservation, remote sensing, artificial intelligence, big data, climatology, emerging infectious diseases, biology, oceanography, engineering, physics, chemistry, materials science, neuroscience, and public health.
  • The Foundation is not interested in supporting fundamental research projects or projects that are already at a stage where significant venture capital is available.

Selection Process & Evaluation Criteria:

The selection process has two stages. In the first, each submission will be reviewed by foundation staff with advice from external reviewers. Applications will be selected in line with the goals of the Moore Inventor Fellows program. In the second stage, ten finalists will be invited to virtually present to a panel of advisors on the importance, plausibility, status, and possible impact of their proposed line of work. After these presentations, the advisory panel and foundation staff will make recommendations to the foundation president for the 2025 fellowships.

Applications will be evaluated with the following criteria:

In the first round, the following questions are used to evaluate each application:

  • Rate the candidate’s capabilities as an inventor.
  • Rate the potential of the proposed invention to make a difference in the foundation’s areas of interest: scientific discovery, environmental conservation, and/or patient care.
  • Rate the potential for measurable progress within a 3-year period.

In the second round, the following questions are used to evaluate each application:

  • Rate the candidate’s capabilities as an inventor.
  • Rate the potential impact of the proposed project.
  • Rate the plausibility of the invention to achieve its stated impact.
  • Rate the potential for measurable progress within a 3-year period.
  • Rate the overall application, considering both the inventor and invention.

See the Foundation website and updated FAQs for details.

Eligibility

  • Candidates must be faculty, research scientists, postdocs, or other full-time staff who can receive funding through their institutions.
  • Candidates must be within 10 years of receiving the terminal degree in their field (M.S., M.D. or Ph.D. received on or after 2016).
  • Each fellow is expected to be personally engaged in pursuing their invention and are required to devote at least 25% of their own time to their invention. 

Application Requirements

Cornell is limited to submitting 2 nominees. Due to this limitation, an internal selection process will be coordinated. Chairpersons/Division Heads/Institute Directors may submit no more than two nominations from their department/division/institute.

Note: Chairs/Division Heads/institute Directors submitting more than one nomination must send a statement commenting on the relative strengths and weaknesses of the two nominees to researchdean@med.cornell.edu.

Margins should be at least one inch and font size not less than 12 pt.

  1. A 30-lines scienfitic abstract explaining the quantification of the applicant and fit of the project for this funding mechanism.
  2. Letter of Nomination by the Department Chair/Division Chief/Institute Director that evaluate the promise of the applicant and the invention, and that describes the strength of the institution’s commitment to the applicant’s invention activities. The letter must attest to the 25% protected time to work on the invention and the contribution of $50,000 in annual direct support of the inventor’s work.(2 pages long)
  3. Statement of invention (no more than two pages, including citations; single-spaced, 12-point font with one-inch margins). The first paragraph should describe clearly and without jargon the invention, the problem it seeks to address and its potential impact. The statement of invention should also include the following information:
    • Description of invention
    • Importance to science, environmental conservation or patient care (please select one)
    • Stage of invention
    • Current funding
    • Feasibility
    • Risk (please describe any technical risks that might lower chances of success and what you will do mitigate these risks. For example, “If A doesn't work, we'll do B.”).
    • Potential Impact
    • Approach for measuring progress during the grant term.

4. Biosketch (2-page limit). Including:

    • Date of terminal degree
    • Educational and professional background
    • Key accomplishments, honors and demonstrated areas of expert knowledge
    • Other background information relevant to this invention

5. Brief budget justification that outlines how grant funds will be used (less than one page).

Past Recipients

Frequently Asked Questions

As an institution eligible to participate in the Moore Inventor Fellows program, is there a specific process for internal solicitation and selection we should follow?

There is no specific process for internal solicitation and selection outlined by the foundation. We recognize inventors and innovators come from a diversity of backgrounds, disciplines and experiences and will look for creativity across a broad array of academic programs and research departments. Examples of such programs include, but are not limited to, environmental science and conservation, oceanography, biology, engineering, physics, chemistry, materials science, neuroscience, public health and gerontology.

In the RFP, you highlight targeted areas for patient care but not the other programs. Can you say more about what you are looking for and what you are not looking for in the realm of patient care?

With respect to patient care only, we focus this call on areas in which our foundation is currently engaged. We are interested in solutions in diagnostic excellence, medication safety in the community and community-based serious illness care. While we are open to ideas outside of these specific areas, we seek projects in patient care that directly improve the experience and outcomes of patients. We do not plan to make fellowship awards in ideas that focus on disease specific inventions, randomized control trials for drug efficacy or basic biomedical research.

I have an application to submit for the program. How do I gain access to the online application portal?

Only the primary contact for each eligible institution can access to the application portal and should submit applications on behalf of their institution’s nominees. If you are the primary contact and would like to request a login to the portal, please email inventors@moore.org.

Can an institution nominate a person who has previously been considered for the Moore Inventor Fellows program?

Yes, institutions can nominate a person who was previously nominated, provided they still meet the eligibility requirements of the program.

My institution is not listed as eligible to participate in the Moore Inventor Fellows program. Is there an alternative route by which I can submit an application for consideration?

At this time, the competition is open only to inventors at Research 1 universities, selected medical schools, and selected environmental research and patient care institutions. Each eligible institution may nominate two people.

If an institution is part of a larger university system, do you allow nominations from other campuses not stated on the list of eligible institutions? What is the full list of eligible institutions?

Each institution is limited to nominating candidates from within its own campus. Schools that are part of systems with multiple campuses (e.g., large state systems) may not submit nominations for a candidate from another campus. The eligible institutions are:
Albert Einstein School of Medicine
Amazon Conservation Association
Amazon Conservation Team
American Museum of Natural History
Arizona State University-Tempe
Auburn University
Ballad Health
Baylor College of Medicine
Baystate Medical Center
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences
Binghamton University
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston College
Boston University
Boston University Medical Campus
Brandeis University
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Brown University
California Academy of Sciences
California Institute of Technology
Carnegie Institution of Washington
Carnegie Mellon University
Case Western Reserve University
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Clark University, Clark Labs
Clemson University
Cleveland Clinic
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Colorado State University-Fort Collins
Columbia University
Conservation International
Conservation X Labs
Consortium for Ocean Leadership Inc
Cornell University
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Dartmouth College
Dartmouth University
Drexel University
Duke University
Emory University
Environmental Defense Fund
Field Museum of Natural History FlipLabs / Future of Fish (ImpactAssets) Florida International University
Florida State University
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Geisinger
George Mason University
George Washington University
Georgetown University
Georgia Institute of Technology
Georgia State University
Gulf of Maine Research Institute
Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute
Harvard University
Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai
Indiana University
Indiana University-Purdue University
Indianapolis School of Medicine
Intermountain Healthcare
Iowa State University
Island Conservation
J Craig Venter Institute, Inc.
Johns Hopkins Medicine
Johns Hopkins University
Kaiser Permanente
Kansas State University
Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
Marine Biological Laboratory
Massachusetts General Hospital
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Mayo Clinic
Medical College of Wisconsin
Medical University of South Carolina
MedStar Health
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Michigan State University
Mississippi State University
Montana State University
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute/Monterey Bay Aquarium Foundation National Aquarium
National Geographic Society
Nationwide Children's Hospital
New England Aquarium
New Jersey Institute of Technology
New York Botanical GardenNew York University
New York University School of Medicine
North Carolina State University at Raleigh Northeastern University
Northwell Health
Northwestern University
Ohio State University
Oklahoma State University
Oregon Health and Science University
Oregon State University
Penn State Health (Hershey Medical Center)
Pennsylvania State University
Princeton University
Purdue University
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Rice University
Rocky Mountain Institute
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Smithsonian Institution
Stanford University
Stony Brook University - SUNY
Stroud Water Research Center Inc.
SUNY at Albany
Syracuse University
Temple University
Texas A&M University
Texas Tech University
The Botanical Research Institute of Texas
The Conservation Fund (The Freshwater Institute)
The National Center for Genome Resources
The Nature Conservancy
The Scripps Research Institute
The University of Alabama
The University of Tennessee-Knoxville
The University of Texas at Arlington
The University of Texas at Austin
The University of Texas at Dallas
The University of Texas at El Paso
The University of Texas, MD Andersen Cancer Center
The University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center
Tufts Medical Center
Tufts University
Tulane University
University at Buffalo - SUNY
University of Alabama at Birmingham
University of Arizona
University of Arkansas
University of California, Berkeley
University of California, Davis
University of California, Irvine
University of California, Los Angeles
University of California, Merced*
University of California, Riverside
University of California, San Diego
University of California, San Francisco
University of California, Santa Barbara
University of California, Santa Cruz
University of Central Florida
University of Chicago
University of Cincinnati-Main Campus
University of Colorado Boulder
University of Colorado, Denver
University of Connecticut
University of Delaware
University of Florida
University of Georgia
University of Hawaii at Manoa
University of Houston
University of Illinois at Chicago
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
University of Iowa
University of Kansas
University of Kentucky
University of Louisville
University of Maryland, Baltimore (School of Medicine)
University of Maryland, College Park
University of Massachusetts Medical School
University of Massachusetts-Amherst
University of Miami
University of Miami School of Medicine
University of Michigan
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
University of Mississippi
University of Missouri-Columbia
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
University of Nevada-Las Vegas
University of Nevada-Reno
University of New Hampshire-Main Campus
University of New Mexico-Main Campus
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
University of North Texas
University of Notre Dame
University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus
University of OregonUniversity of Pennsylvania
University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus University of Rochester
University of South Carolina-Columbia
University of South Florida-Main Campus University of Southern California
University of Southern Mississippi
University of Utah
University of Virginia
University of Washington
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Vanderbilt University
Virginia Commonwealth University
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Wake Forest University
Washington State University
Washington University in St. Louis
Wayne State University
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
West Virginia University
Wildlife Conservation Society
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Woods Hole Research Center
World Resources Institute
World Wildlife Fund (WWF US)
Yale University

I am an eligible individual at a participating institution but may leave my current institution during the course of the grant. Am I still eligible? Would you consider transferring a grant?

Yes. The most important goal is for an individual to make progress on their project. We would make the grant to your current institution and discuss, on a case-by-case basis, the best way to handle the full term of the award if a fellow’s status changes.

Are only individuals who have completed the terminal degree in their field eligible for nomination (e.g., no undergraduate or graduate students)?

Yes. This competition is open only to faculty and staff at eligible institutions.

Is there a specific cutoff date for the career stage requirement?

All candidates must be no more than ten years past receiving their Ph.D., M.D., M.S. or other terminal degree. A degree received on any date in 2010 is acceptable.

I am an associate professor at an eligible university, within 10 years of starting my tenure-line post but beyond 10 years of receiving my degree. Am I eligible to apply?

No. All candidates must be within 10 years of receiving their Ph.D. or other terminal degree. However, a degree received on any date in 2010 is acceptable.

Is there an exception for time taken for maternity or family leave?

We recognize that the early career window differentially impacts candidates who have taken maternity or family leave. In these cases, please reach out to us to discuss the specifics, as we will make an exception to the 10-year requirement.

I am a surgeon who received my degree more than 10 years ago, but spent multiple years in clinical training after receiving my degree because of the specific field of medicine I am in, am I eligible?

An exception is made for physicians with five or more years of clinical training since obtaining their terminal degree. These clinicians are eligible if they are within five years of completing clinical training. For example, a cardiothoracic surgeon who completed five years of general surgery residency and three years of fellowship, would have five years of eligibility beyond the completion of their fellowship.

I have a master’s degree but not a Ph.D. Am I still eligible for nomination?

Yes. Different fields have different practices with regard to terminal degrees. We want to allow the most highly qualified candidates to be nominated. The terminal degree should be a graduate level degree, such as a Ph.D., M.D., MBA, MSc, MPH, or other similar degree.

I am a member of an institution whose research, teaching and service responsibilities prevent me from spending a quarter of my time on invention activities. Does this mean I am ineligible?

Yes. Fellows must be engaged in the pursuit of their invention at least 25 percent time for the three-year duration of the award.

We are a team of two or more eligible faculty/staff. Can we apply as a group or must nominations be for an individual?

Each nomination must be for a single individual who is the project lead. However, we understand that many projects are made possible through collaboration and allow grant funds to be used toward collaboration in service of the project.

How much flexibility does the fellow have with respect to budget allocations?

Fellows can determine how grant funds are used for project purposes. Grant funds may be used to support portions of salary, undergraduate or graduate students, equipment or supplies.

Is the grant award for fellows $600,000 or $675,000?

The total grant award is $675,000 for a three-year period. The fellow receives a total of $600,000 ($200,000 each year, for three years). The home institution will receive a total of $75,000 ($25,000 each year for three years to offset costs associated with grant management).

Can you please clarify what costs are permissible as part of the institution’s $50,000 annual contribution?

Each host institution needs to contribute $50,000 in annual direct support of the inventor’s work each year of the fellowship. This could include support for undergraduate or graduate students, equipment, supplies and other needs that will enable the fellow to make progress on their work. Direct salary support is acceptable provided it includes a proportionate release of time from teaching or other duties. Funds that were designated for a fellow’s use before the fellow was awarded a Moore Inventor Fellowship (such as start-up funds) do not qualify. A clear statement of the proposed institutional support is part of the nomination.

I have an idea for an invention but am not sure if it fits within the Moore Inventor Fellows program goals. How can I check?

We seek to support ideas and inventors grounded in science and technology that could make important contributions to the areas of science, patient care or environmental conservation. We’ve made specific adjustments to our patient care parameters and these can be found on page one in this FAQ. To help ensure we have the strongest applicant pool possible, we have asked each eligible institution to nominate two candidates for consideration. We suggest you contact your institution point person to better understand the process for selection. The foundation does not plan to respond to preliminary inquiries from individuals.

What kind of information are you looking for in the “statement of invention”? How in-depth and technical should the description be, and do you allow figures, charts or other graphics?

From the call for proposals, we expect no more than two pages describing: the main idea, that idea’s importance, its stage of invention, the problem the idea seeks to address, any existing or planned funding, technical feasibility and potential impact of the invention in one of our three programmatic themes: science, environmental conservation or patient care. You may include figures, charts and references within the total page length limit.

Will the intellectual property presented in the “statement of invention” be protected during the competition?

Yes, absolutely. We appreciate that nominees are sharing potentially valuable information with the foundation. All staff and external advisors who review applications have signed nondisclosure agreements with the foundation. All material submitted is protected. The foundation’s Data Sharing and Intellectual Property Policy states all intellectual property must be managed and disseminated in a manner that leads to the greatest impact. Each award will include IP terms to reflect the needs of that project.

In a project centered around invention, IP terms may be important to achieving the intended impact, so it may be appropriate to negotiate project-specific IP terms for the grant agreement. Intellectual property terms can be negotiated on a case-by-case basis once projects have been selected for funding. Submission of an application does not commit the university/institution or PI in advance to any particular IP terms.

Will I receive an update on the status of my nomination?

We will inform institutional contacts of their nominees’ application status, but are unable to provide any review, feedback or assessment information.

Please read the Moore Inventor Fellows Guidelines for more details.